Skip to content

Database primary key supports unbinding block #10849

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
TCOTC opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Database primary key supports unbinding block #10849

TCOTC opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Vanessa219
Labels
Enhancement
Milestone
3.0.8

Comments

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024 •
edited by 88250
Loading

数据库主键支持取消关联

In what scenarios do you need this feature?

数据库主键从纯文本变成关联某个块之后，就无法取消关联恢复为纯文本了

Describe the optimal solution

取消关联时保留关联的块名称为纯文本。举个例子就是下面这个关联的文档，取消关联之后仍然保留文档名，而不是直接清空主键

image

Describe the candidate solution

No response

Other information

No response
@TCOTC TCOTC mentioned this issue Apr 3, 2024
Open
@5kyfkr
Copy link

5kyfkr commented Apr 3, 2024

支持，这个可以弄

@88250 88250 added this to the 3.0.8 milestone Apr 4, 2024
@88250 88250 removed their assignment Apr 7, 2024
@88250 88250 changed the title 数据库主键支持取消关联 Database primary key supports unbinding block Apr 7, 2024
88250 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2024
@88250
🎨 Database primary key supports unbinding block #10849

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
88250 D
GPG key ID: 86211BA83DF03017
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode
128e12a
Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2024
@Vanessa219
🎨 fix #10849
572b8db
88250 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2024
@88250
🎨 Database primary key supports unbinding block #10849
79d940d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Vanessa219 Vanessa219

Labels
Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@88250 @Vanessa219 @5kyfkr @TCOTC