Skip to content

Improve flashcard menu #10857

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
TCOTC opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 8 comments
Closed

Improve flashcard menu #10857

TCOTC opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

Describe the problem

这个「快速制卡」太显眼了:

image

image

Version environment

- Version: 3.0.7
- Operating System: Win10
- Browser (if used):
@TCOTC TCOTC changed the title 改进菜单 改进菜单UI Apr 3, 2024
@Vanessa219
Copy link
Member

这样么?

image

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

感觉要不改成「删除制卡」?「取消快速制卡」怪怪的。

这样感觉规整点:

image

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

然后我有个问题,在文档树上的这个快速制卡是做什么用的?

还有为啥只有文档树有取消快速制卡?其他地方只有快速制卡:

image

@Vanessa219
Copy link
Member

应该是写漏了。

@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 changed the title 改进菜单UI Improve flashcard menu Apr 3, 2024
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 added this to the 3.0.8 milestone Apr 3, 2024
@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

然后我有个问题,在文档树上的这个快速制卡是做什么用的?

原来是把整个文档作为一个闪卡。不如叫「文档制卡」更直观点

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

应该是写漏了。

不对,我研究了一下,其他地方的「快速制卡」点一下是制卡,点第二下是取消制卡,只有文档树上的这两个操作是分开的。

其他地方的操作是合并的,是因为这两个地方需要打开文档才能点击,而打开文档就知道当前文档是否制卡了:

image

文档树上的不合并是因为没打开文档的情况下不知道该文档是否已经制卡,所以点击「快速制卡」就能确保文档被制卡、点击「取消快速制卡」就能确保文档不被制卡

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Apr 3, 2024

所以就只是这个外观有点问题,功能没有问题:

image

image

@Vanessa219
Copy link
Member

Vanessa219 commented Apr 3, 2024

当初好像是这么想来着,还没看代码。那就先改一下文案为"移除闪卡"。制卡是一个动作,只是移除这张卡片。

Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants