Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 #11981

Closed
TCOTC opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 #11981

TCOTC opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor

TCOTC commented Jul 15, 2024

01 大纲只能操作导出预览:

default.webm

02 另一种表现:

03 点击大纲会把文档切换为导出预览:

default.webm
@TCOTC TCOTC changed the title 所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 🐛 所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 Aug 10, 2024
@88250 88250 changed the title 🐛 所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 所见即所得导出预览 分屏时大纲有点问题 Aug 11, 2024
Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2024
@Vanessa219 Vanessa219 added this to the 3.1.7 milestone Sep 15, 2024
@88250 88250 removed this from the 3.1.7 milestone Sep 15, 2024
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Sep 15, 2024

这个改动就不拉进版本了。
This change will not be included in the version.

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Sep 15, 2024

点击一下大纲,焦点就跑到右边的页签去了,没有恢复到原来的焦点:

default.webm

@Vanessa219
Copy link
Member

点击大纲后,焦点就不在编辑器上了,再点击标题就会选取最后一个编辑器。

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Sep 16, 2024

为什么不能把焦点恢复到最后操作的页签呢?

Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2024
@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Sep 16, 2024

  • 导出预览 切换为 所见即所得 时没有去除一级标题
  • 所见即所得 切换为 导出预览 时没有增加一级标题

我觉得干脆就不要这个一级标题,没啥用。点击大纲上的文档标题也一样能回到顶部

default.webm

@TCOTC
Copy link
Contributor Author

TCOTC commented Sep 16, 2024

还是会把所见即所得的文档变成导出预览:

01

第一次打开工作空间或者重新启动思源后,点击随意一个文章的大纲目录,就会切换成导出浏览模式:#12500

02

  1. 打开 A B 两个文档
  2. A 文档分屏到右侧,然后切换为导出预览模式
  3. 点击左侧的 B 文档
  4. 点击大纲(不是标题)
  5. 点击一个标题
default.webm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants