We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
如图,2处tab,没有携带子项:我还以为tab的逻辑变了,但是脱离子项也不合理 然后在6处tab,发现又携带了子项:所以这应该是2处的tab有BUG
和过去一样 tab会携带子项一起调整
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
感谢反馈,应该不关联子项缩进的。
Sorry, something went wrong.
说反了吧… 应该是关联子项缩进吧?
不关联的,参考 Word。
嗯,明白了 我到word和typora上操作了一下:的确是不关联的 但是 我这种需求还是在的,而且很高频:子项跟随缩进 word和typora也都提供 其他的方式去做:多选批量缩进,能否支持一下呢 因为关联缩进的调整是很自然的需求
一点讨论: word也许不是合适的参考对象吧:word和思源应该不太是一类,而且word的列表也不是主打 在列表方面更强的,比如logseq, RoamEdit, RemNote等全部都用的是思源过去的方式:tab直接 关联子项缩进 为什么弃用了 tab关联子项 呢
通过拖拽进行块的结构调整更好,尽量统一逻辑。
Vanessa219
No branches or pull requests
描述问题 Describe the problem
tab.BUG.mp4
如图,2处tab,没有携带子项:我还以为tab的逻辑变了,但是脱离子项也不合理
然后在6处tab,发现又携带了子项:所以这应该是2处的tab有BUG
期待的结果 Expected result
和过去一样 tab会携带子项一起调整
版本环境 Version environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: