Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Online check always uses the same fixed url (baidu.com). #7835

Closed
3 tasks done
eulores opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

Online check always uses the same fixed url (baidu.com). #7835

eulores opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@eulores
Copy link
Contributor

eulores commented Mar 30, 2023

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Can the issue be reproduced with the default theme (daylight/midnight)?

  • I was able to reproduce the issue with the default theme

Could the issue be due to extensions?

  • I've ruled out the possibility that the extension is causing the problem.

Describe the problem

I constantly receive this error message:
The network connectivity verification of the cloud storage service provider is abnormal, please check the network configuration.
implying that my cloud storage service is not reachable.

Yet, verification via the browser shows no connectivity issues.

As it turns out, the online verification is done against baidu.com, and the one second timeout is too short and triggers this error message.

Expected result

I am expecting to continue using the cloud storage service with no errors.

Screenshot or screen recording presentation

No response

Version environment

- Version: 2.8.2
- Operating System: Windows
- Browser (if used): n/a

Log file

n/a

More information

The function isOnline in the file kernel/util/net.go ignores the argument checkURL and instead uses baidu.com with a very short timeout.

Please also consider including google.com as another of the online checking default URLs, thanks.

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Mar 31, 2023

Duplicate of #7831

@88250 88250 marked this as a duplicate of #7831 Mar 31, 2023
@88250 88250 closed this as completed Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants