Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ctrl+D abnormal behavior #9841

Closed
3 tasks done
heheda123123 opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Ctrl+D abnormal behavior #9841

heheda123123 opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@heheda123123
Copy link

heheda123123 commented Dec 8, 2023

windows上,自定义插入代码块快捷键产生异常行为在 2.11.1 版本又出现了

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Can the issue be reproduced with the default theme (daylight/midnight)?

  • I was able to reproduce the issue with the default theme

Could the issue be due to extensions?

  • I've ruled out the possibility that the extension is causing the problem.

Describe the problem

之前提过issue #9735
后面的版本就解决了,但是到了2.11.1,问题又出现了

Expected result

正确处理

Screenshot or screen recording presentation

No response

Version environment

- Version: 2.11.1
- Operating System: windows
- Browser (if used):

Log file

应该不用

More information

No response

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented Dec 8, 2023

和这个问题是同一个吗? https://ld246.com/article/1702001482861

@heheda123123
Copy link
Author

是的,看她这个帖子,和我发的第一个issue是一样的问题
看来和插入代码块没关系,是快捷键Ctrl d的特殊性

@88250 88250 changed the title windows上,自定义插入代码块快捷键产生异常行为在 2.11.1 版本又出现了 Ctrl+D abnormal behavior Dec 8, 2023
@88250 88250 added the Bug label Dec 8, 2023
@88250 88250 added this to the 2.11.2 milestone Dec 8, 2023
@Vanessa219
Copy link
Member

非常抱歉,由于 #9770 这个问题忽略了。下个版本继续改进。

Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2023
@88250 88250 closed this as completed Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants