My Biggest Regret As A Programmer

本贴最后更新于 2963 天前,其中的信息可能已经时移世改

A little over 20 years ago I was at a crossroads. My second company was petering out when our 5 years of building Deltagraph for the publisher ended (they wanted to move into the nascent internet space). At that point I had 13 years experience as a programmer but also 9 years or so experience running a company (at the same time).

I no longer wanted to do both. My first company 85-87 not only built a new kind of spreadsheet program but also published it ourselves. I led the company, did all the press interviews, managed the investors, did all the usual business stuff and also was one of the three programmers and the UI designer. After we shipped the product in early 87 I also wound up in the hospital. Trying to be both leader and programmer was simply too much.

So at that point in 1994 I could have gone either into technical management or continued as a programmer. I chose programmer because it was easier. Today I now realize how wrong I was despite all the great stuff I’ve been able to work on and ship over the past 20 years. Going towards the CTO/CIO/VP Engineering route, which was fairly new back then, would have been a much better plan.

I was in the Bay area for a year around 1995 and worked at Apple for the last half. Apple looked to be falling apart and I left to return to Texas as I didn’t want to see my favorite company die around me. Big mistake.

Not only did Apple begin a huge turnaround a year later when Steve came back, but the whole Dotcom explosion happened. Being both an experienced programmer and leader who understood what it took to deliver (we did 9 major releases of the apps during my time, all of which I built the master floppies for, with no need for hot fixes which were hard to do then anyway) I can only imagine how in demand I could have been. Once you get to the level of one of those titles you can keep moving forward and up.

My sister started as a programmer 30 years ago but jumped into management within the first year and has been a VP at a big company for the past 15 or so years. The huge parent of the travel company I worked for a couple years ago had a CEO who started 15 years earlier as a programmer. Of course these types of jobs can be hard and unpleasant but for that the renumeration is way greater. My sister has 10X the assets I have.

Over the years I’ve seen how little ability you have as a programmer, no matter how good you are, at making a difference or changing things that are broken. I simply didn’t realize how little room you have to advance as just a programmer (or even architect or the like); the power to change exists at a level not available to you as a mere delivery device. Add to that the financial benefits, the higher likelihood of substantial IPO participation, and all the other things you gain access to, and being a programmer means you have to be happy with the opportunity to build cool things.

Over the years the worst places I’ve worked or helped as a consultant for those 5 or so years I did that were almost always due to inept, incompetent or downright idiotic technology management. There isn’t enough room in this blog to list them all.

Take the VP of engineering for a bank who remarked that he didn’t need to understand technology as he managed people, yet still made technology decisions. The CIO at the same place never believed anything his employees told him but believed everything vendors told him. Of course we knew he was taking kickbacks as we kept buying things we had no use for and he kept writing articles for them relating how wonderful their products were for us. Yet we used almost none of it. Some time after I left he was fired and perp-walked out of the company yet immediately got another similar CIO position.

The worst job I ever had started out as what I thought would be awesome. A post-startup had a successful niche in their industry; both they and their arch-rivals (different niche) both wanted to launch into a broader public market and the market was heating up. I was hired as a second programmer. The other programmer and manager had been hired to build a new broader online store as the existing one was too inflexible and slow for a big market. The company had zero technical leadership otherwise, the CEO and the other two founders had no technical experience or knowledge. The programmer constantly talked about how wonderful his backend code was and the manager supported him. I built a front end piece, put up demos, checked in my source every day. When I thought it a good time to integrate I discovered the other programmer after 10 months had checked in—nothing. When I pointed this out the manager said “he never checks in anything until it’s perfect”. Yet no one called this out as stupid other than me. I spent the next two months trying desperately to get the 3 founders to bring in people who could actually deliver (I knew several people) but they were afraid to make any changes and admit they had screwed up in hiring these two guys. Eventually I gave up and left.

A year later after still getting nothing from this guy they fired both of them. They tried to hire some consulting firm but got nothing from them either. By this time it was too late. The rivals? They became a billion dollar public company and I see their commercials on TV sometimes. I always want to throw a shoe at the TV when I see them. We had everything but a damn store and in reality actual technology leadership. If I had been such a person instead of a programmer I would have had the track record and clout to make it happen. But all I was was a programmer.

I could go on and on but the key is that you can’t make changes in how people do things in a technical sense unless you have the ability, the authority and the opportunity. Once you make that call and assuming you find the right places to grow, the sky is really the limit.

When I was on TV (Computer Chronicles) in early 1987 showing our product Trapeze the other presenter was Mike Slade who was product manager of Excel. At the time young me thought him some random marketing weenie (young people can be pretty stupid). Yet he started all these companies later including ESPN, worked for Apple in various leadership roles, was a good friend of Steve Jobs and started his own VC firm.

And today I am still just a programmer. Who’s the weenie now? I doubt I will ever be able to really retire. Thankfully I am still good at delivery (I was recruited into my present job by a former manager who needed what he knew I can do) but still all I will be until I croak is what I am now.

Being a programmer for nearly 35 years and still being able to get things done and ship is still fun and I’ve been able to work on amazing things over the years. But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

I came to a fork in the road and took the one less traveled. Perhaps now I realize why.

source: http://thecodist.com/article/my-biggest-regret-as-a-programmer

  • 程序员

    程序员是从事程序开发、程序维护的专业人员。

    539 引用 • 3528 回帖
  • 遗憾
    2 引用 • 8 回帖

相关帖子

欢迎来到这里!

我们正在构建一个小众社区,大家在这里相互信任,以平等 • 自由 • 奔放的价值观进行分享交流。最终,希望大家能够找到与自己志同道合的伙伴,共同成长。

注册 关于
请输入回帖内容 ...
  • 可以翻译下么?

  • 其他回帖
  • 转管理后,静静的写下代码就是一种享受

  • @Vanessa http://blog.jobbole.com/99428/ 这里有翻译,不允许转载,直接贴链接了。。。

  • ss

    @Vanessa 一个愤世嫉俗的老程序员瞎掰掰。关于做程序员还是做管理纠结来纠结去。做了很久程序员就羡慕管理的,做了管理的觉得管理的人很傻就觉得还是程序员好。纠结来纠结去截止文章发稿,作者觉得还是程序员好一点,还是啥好?不知道现在改了没有。
    看看这个纠结劲:

    But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

    So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

    啊,真替他纠结啊,到老还惦记着 return of Steve to Apple 那件事。直接最适合做一个湿人了。

  • 查看全部回帖

推荐标签 标签

  • flomo

    flomo 是新一代 「卡片笔记」 ,专注在碎片化时代,促进你的记录,帮你积累更多知识资产。

    4 引用 • 88 回帖 • 5 关注
  • ReactiveX

    ReactiveX 是一个专注于异步编程与控制可观察数据(或者事件)流的 API。它组合了观察者模式,迭代器模式和函数式编程的优秀思想。

    1 引用 • 2 回帖 • 124 关注
  • Pipe

    Pipe 是一款小而美的开源博客平台。Pipe 有着非常活跃的社区,可将文章作为帖子推送到社区,来自社区的回帖将作为博客评论进行联动(具体细节请浏览 B3log 构思 - 分布式社区网络)。

    这是一种全新的网络社区体验,让热爱记录和分享的你不再感到孤单!

    131 引用 • 1114 回帖 • 147 关注
  • 心情

    心是产生任何想法的源泉,心本体会陷入到对自己本体不能理解的状态中,因为心能产生任何想法,不能分出对错,不能分出自己。

    59 引用 • 369 回帖
  • Mobi.css

    Mobi.css is a lightweight, flexible CSS framework that focus on mobile.

    1 引用 • 6 回帖 • 703 关注
  • 面试

    面试造航母,上班拧螺丝。多面试,少加班。

    324 引用 • 1395 回帖
  • Redis

    Redis 是一个开源的使用 ANSI C 语言编写、支持网络、可基于内存亦可持久化的日志型、Key-Value 数据库,并提供多种语言的 API。从 2010 年 3 月 15 日起,Redis 的开发工作由 VMware 主持。从 2013 年 5 月开始,Redis 的开发由 Pivotal 赞助。

    284 引用 • 247 回帖 • 163 关注
  • OpenStack

    OpenStack 是一个云操作系统,通过数据中心可控制大型的计算、存储、网络等资源池。所有的管理通过前端界面管理员就可以完成,同样也可以通过 Web 接口让最终用户部署资源。

    10 引用 • 3 关注
  • Elasticsearch

    Elasticsearch 是一个基于 Lucene 的搜索服务器。它提供了一个分布式多用户能力的全文搜索引擎,基于 RESTful 接口。Elasticsearch 是用 Java 开发的,并作为 Apache 许可条款下的开放源码发布,是当前流行的企业级搜索引擎。设计用于云计算中,能够达到实时搜索,稳定,可靠,快速,安装使用方便。

    116 引用 • 99 回帖 • 268 关注
  • NetBeans

    NetBeans 是一个始于 1997 年的 Xelfi 计划,本身是捷克布拉格查理大学的数学及物理学院的学生计划。此计划延伸而成立了一家公司进而发展这个商用版本的 NetBeans IDE,直到 1999 年 Sun 买下此公司。Sun 于次年(2000 年)六月将 NetBeans IDE 开源,直到现在 NetBeans 的社群依然持续增长。

    78 引用 • 102 回帖 • 640 关注
  • 周末

    星期六到星期天晚,实行五天工作制后,指每周的最后两天。再过几年可能就是三天了。

    14 引用 • 297 回帖
  • SEO

    发布对别人有帮助的原创内容是最好的 SEO 方式。

    35 引用 • 200 回帖 • 27 关注
  • IBM

    IBM(国际商业机器公司)或万国商业机器公司,简称 IBM(International Business Machines Corporation),总公司在纽约州阿蒙克市。1911 年托马斯·沃森创立于美国,是全球最大的信息技术和业务解决方案公司,拥有全球雇员 30 多万人,业务遍及 160 多个国家和地区。

    16 引用 • 53 回帖 • 123 关注
  • DevOps

    DevOps(Development 和 Operations 的组合词)是一组过程、方法与系统的统称,用于促进开发(应用程序/软件工程)、技术运营和质量保障(QA)部门之间的沟通、协作与整合。

    40 引用 • 24 回帖
  • RIP

    愿逝者安息!

    8 引用 • 92 回帖 • 294 关注
  • 学习

    “梦想从学习开始,事业从实践起步” —— 习近平

    162 引用 • 473 回帖
  • 国际化

    i18n(其来源是英文单词 internationalization 的首末字符 i 和 n,18 为中间的字符数)是“国际化”的简称。对程序来说,国际化是指在不修改代码的情况下,能根据不同语言及地区显示相应的界面。

    7 引用 • 26 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 以太坊

    以太坊(Ethereum)并不是一个机构,而是一款能够在区块链上实现智能合约、开源的底层系统。以太坊是一个平台和一种编程语言 Solidity,使开发人员能够建立和发布下一代去中心化应用。 以太坊可以用来编程、分散、担保和交易任何事物:投票、域名、金融交易所、众筹、公司管理、合同和知识产权等等。

    34 引用 • 367 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 互联网

    互联网(Internet),又称网际网络,或音译因特网、英特网。互联网始于 1969 年美国的阿帕网,是网络与网络之间所串连成的庞大网络,这些网络以一组通用的协议相连,形成逻辑上的单一巨大国际网络。

    96 引用 • 330 回帖
  • Webswing

    Webswing 是一个能将任何 Swing 应用通过纯 HTML5 运行在浏览器中的 Web 服务器,详细介绍请看 将 Java Swing 应用变成 Web 应用

    1 引用 • 15 回帖 • 633 关注
  • 创业

    你比 99% 的人都优秀么?

    82 引用 • 1398 回帖
  • React

    React 是 Facebook 开源的一个用于构建 UI 的 JavaScript 库。

    192 引用 • 291 回帖 • 440 关注
  • 新人

    让我们欢迎这对新人。哦,不好意思说错了,让我们欢迎这位新人!
    新手上路,请谨慎驾驶!

    51 引用 • 226 回帖 • 1 关注
  • IPFS

    IPFS(InterPlanetary File System,星际文件系统)是永久的、去中心化保存和共享文件的方法,这是一种内容可寻址、版本化、点对点超媒体的分布式协议。请浏览 IPFS 入门笔记了解更多细节。

    20 引用 • 245 回帖 • 233 关注
  • OpenResty

    OpenResty 是一个基于 NGINX 与 Lua 的高性能 Web 平台,其内部集成了大量精良的 Lua 库、第三方模块以及大多数的依赖项。用于方便地搭建能够处理超高并发、扩展性极高的动态 Web 应用、Web 服务和动态网关。

    17 引用 • 39 关注
  • JWT

    JWT(JSON Web Token)是一种用于双方之间传递信息的简洁的、安全的表述性声明规范。JWT 作为一个开放的标准(RFC 7519),定义了一种简洁的,自包含的方法用于通信双方之间以 JSON 的形式安全的传递信息。

    20 引用 • 15 回帖 • 23 关注
  • 禅道

    禅道是一款国产的开源项目管理软件,她的核心管理思想基于敏捷方法 scrum,内置了产品管理和项目管理,同时又根据国内研发现状补充了测试管理、计划管理、发布管理、文档管理、事务管理等功能,在一个软件中就可以将软件研发中的需求、任务、bug、用例、计划、发布等要素有序的跟踪管理起来,完整地覆盖了项目管理的核心流程。

    5 引用 • 15 回帖 • 209 关注