加入我们只需要和我们一起学习!
从零补齐扎实的理论计算机数学基础!
介绍:
https://www.yuque.com/abser/mathincs/preview
例子:
https://www.yuque.com/abser/mathincs/theorem1.5.1
Theorem1.5.1. If 0 <= x <= 2,then -x^3+4x+1>0.
Question
Theorem1.5.1. If,then.
Solution
Proof. Assume . Then x, 2-x and 2+x are all nonnegative.
Therefore, the product of these terms is also nonnegative. Adding 1 to this product gives a positive number, so:
Multiplying out on the left side proves that
as claimed.
Learn way
-
You should practice this, learn how to write a Proof . You may do some scratchwork while you’re trying to figure out the logical steps of a proof. Your scratchwork can be as disorganized as you like—full of dead-ends, strange diagrams, obscene words, whatever. But keep your scratchwork separate from your final proof, which should be clear and concise.
-
This is your first CLASS on math, show your search skill while you meet Strange Concept,also I would write some necessary Concept for you.
Homework
- Do you know about what nonnegative means?
- Please figure out why we know that the product of these terms is also nonnegative and how dare we use it without prove it.
also, you could write your answer as comment.
New Concept
Proof Method
method
In order to prove that IMPLIES :
-
Write,“Assume.”
-
Show that logically follows.
Logical Deductions
Logical deductions, or inference rules, are used to prove new propositions using previously proved ones.
A fundamental inference rule is modus ponens. This rule says that a proof of P together with a proof that P IMPLIES Q is a proof of Q.
Inference rules are sometimes written in a funny notation. For example, modus ponens is written:
Rule.
When the statements above the line, called the antecedents, are proved, then we can consider the statement below the line, called the conclusion or consequent, to also be proved.
A key requirement of an inference rule is that it must be sound: an assignment of truth values to the letters P, Q, ..., that makes all the antecedents true must also make the consequent true. So if we start off with true axioms and apply sound inference rules, everything we prove will also be true.
There are many other natural, sound inference rules, for example:
Rule.
Rule.
On the other hand,
Non-Rule.
is not sound: if P is assigned T and Q is assigned F, then the antecedent is true and the consequent is not.
As with axioms, we will not be too formal about the set of legal inference rules. Each step in a proof should be clear and “logical”; in particular, you should state what previously proved facts are used to derive each new conclusion.
3 replies
-
- A nonnegative integer is grater than or equal to 0
- The product of nonnegative integers can be seen as the sum of nonnegative integers,and when we refect the integers to objects in reality,obviously the sum wouldn't be negtive.
ReplyDelete
-
1.A nonnegative is a number bigger than 0.
2.The product of nonnegative integers
can be seem as the sum of nonnegative. so if we add a nonnegative to the non negative integers ,the sum of it is also
no negative.
ReplyDelete
-
@va1ner(vainer)@ 飞云之下(feiyunzhixia)
By homework, I want you know
the set is closed under addition, multiplication, and division.
Think about why you did n’t think deeply here, and try to find these missing things which all have to learn.
and there is wiki link :Positive_real_numbers
欢迎来到这里!
我们正在构建一个小众社区,大家在这里相互信任,以平等 • 自由 • 奔放的价值观进行分享交流。最终,希望大家能够找到与自己志同道合的伙伴,共同成长。
注册 关于