SpringAOP 多切面

本贴最后更新于 1235 天前,其中的信息可能已经时移世异

多切面执行时,采用了责任链设计模式。

切面的配置顺序决定了切面的执行顺序,多个切面执行的过程,类似于方法调用的过程,在环绕通知的 proceed()执行时,去执行下一个切面或如果没有下一个切面执行目标方法,从而达成了如下的执行过程:(目标方法只会执行一次)

执行的顺序和配置顺序等有关
目标方法执行前: 前置,环绕前(顺序可以变)
目标方法执行后: 最终,环绕后,最终(顺序可以变)

责任链设计模式:为解除请求的发送者和接收者之间的耦合,而使多个对象都有机会处理这个请求。将这些对象连成一条链,并沿着这条链传递该请求,直到有对象处理它

因为责任链设计模式 first 切面中调用 poceed 方法后,继续沿着责任链去调用 second 切面中的环绕前-----然后掉 poceed 方法 ----此时没有切面了---沿着责任链去调用 addUser()方法---调用结束 addUser(),在执行环绕 second 环绕后。。。。。

如果目标方法抛出异常

通知间的跳转顺序

多个切入点责任链模式如下图

Aspect1 和 Aspect2 两个切面类中所有通知类型的执行顺序,Method 是具体的切入点,order 代表优先级,它根据一个 int 值来判断优先级的高低,数字越小,优先级越高!所以,不同的切面,实际上是环绕于切入点的同心圆

jdk 代理的源码为(这里采用默认的 jdk 代理模式获取代理,cglib 原理类似):

/* * Copyright 2002-2018 the original author or authors. * * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. * You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ package org.springframework.aop.framework; import java.io.Serializable; import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler; import java.lang.reflect.Method; import java.lang.reflect.Proxy; import java.util.List; import org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInvocation; import org.apache.commons.logging.Log; import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; import org.springframework.aop.AopInvocationException; import org.springframework.aop.RawTargetAccess; import org.springframework.aop.TargetSource; import org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils; import org.springframework.core.DecoratingProxy; import org.springframework.lang.Nullable; import org.springframework.util.Assert; import org.springframework.util.ClassUtils; /** * JDK-based {@link AopProxy} implementation for the Spring AOP framework, * based on JDK {@link java.lang.reflect.Proxy dynamic proxies}. * * <p>Creates a dynamic proxy, implementing the interfaces exposed by * the AopProxy. Dynamic proxies <i>cannot</i> be used to proxy methods * defined in classes, rather than interfaces. * * <p>Objects of this type should be obtained through proxy factories, * configured by an {@link AdvisedSupport} class. This class is internal * to Spring's AOP framework and need not be used directly by client code. * * <p>Proxies created using this class will be thread-safe if the * underlying (target) class is thread-safe. * * <p>Proxies are serializable so long as all Advisors (including Advices * and Pointcuts) and the TargetSource are serializable. * * @author Rod Johnson * @author Juergen Hoeller * @author Rob Harrop * @author Dave Syer * @see java.lang.reflect.Proxy * @see AdvisedSupport * @see ProxyFactory */ final class JdkDynamicAopProxy implements AopProxy, InvocationHandler, Serializable { /** use serialVersionUID from Spring 1.2 for interoperability. */ private static final long serialVersionUID = 5531744639992436476L; /* * NOTE: We could avoid the code duplication between this class and the CGLIB * proxies by refactoring "invoke" into a template method. However, this approach * adds at least 10% performance overhead versus a copy-paste solution, so we sacrifice * elegance for performance. (We have a good test suite to ensure that the different * proxies behave the same :-) * This way, we can also more easily take advantage of minor optimizations in each class. */ /** We use a static Log to avoid serialization issues. */ private static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(JdkDynamicAopProxy.class); /** Config used to configure this proxy. */ private final AdvisedSupport advised; /** * Is the {@link #equals} method defined on the proxied interfaces? */ private boolean equalsDefined; /** * Is the {@link #hashCode} method defined on the proxied interfaces? */ private boolean hashCodeDefined; /** * Construct a new JdkDynamicAopProxy for the given AOP configuration. * @param config the AOP configuration as AdvisedSupport object * @throws AopConfigException if the config is invalid. We try to throw an informative * exception in this case, rather than let a mysterious failure happen later. */ public JdkDynamicAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException { Assert.notNull(config, "AdvisedSupport must not be null"); if (config.getAdvisors().length == 0 && config.getTargetSource() == AdvisedSupport.EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE) { throw new AopConfigException("No advisors and no TargetSource specified"); } this.advised = config; } @Override public Object getProxy() { return getProxy(ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader()); } @Override public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: " + this.advised.getTargetSource()); } Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true); findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces); return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this); } /** * Finds any {@link #equals} or {@link #hashCode} method that may be defined * on the supplied set of interfaces. * @param proxiedInterfaces the interfaces to introspect */ private void findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces) { for (Class<?> proxiedInterface : proxiedInterfaces) { Method[] methods = proxiedInterface.getDeclaredMethods(); for (Method method : methods) { if (AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) { this.equalsDefined = true; } if (AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) { this.hashCodeDefined = true; } if (this.equalsDefined && this.hashCodeDefined) { return; } } } } /** * Implementation of {@code InvocationHandler.invoke}. * <p>Callers will see exactly the exception thrown by the target, * unless a hook method throws an exception. */ @Override @Nullable public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { MethodInvocation invocation; Object oldProxy = null; boolean setProxyContext = false; TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource; Object target = null; try { if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself. return equals(args[0]); } else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself. return hashCode(); } else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) { // There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config. return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised); } else if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() && method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) { // Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config... return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args); } Object retVal; if (this.advised.exposeProxy) { // Make invocation available if necessary. oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy); setProxyContext = true; } // Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target, // in case it comes from a pool. target = targetSource.getTarget(); Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null); // Get the interception chain for this method. List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass); // Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct // reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation. if (chain.isEmpty()) { // We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly // Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does // nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying. Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args); retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse); } else { // We need to create a method invocation... invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain); // Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain. retVal = invocation.proceed(); } // Massage return value if necessary. Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType(); if (retVal != null && retVal == target && returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) && !RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) { // Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method // is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets // a reference to itself in another returned object. retVal = proxy; } else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) { throw new AopInvocationException( "Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method); } return retVal; } finally { if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) { // Must have come from TargetSource. targetSource.releaseTarget(target); } if (setProxyContext) { // Restore old proxy. AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy); } } } /** * Equality means interfaces, advisors and TargetSource are equal. * <p>The compared object may be a JdkDynamicAopProxy instance itself * or a dynamic proxy wrapping a JdkDynamicAopProxy instance. */ @Override public boolean equals(@Nullable Object other) { if (other == this) { return true; } if (other == null) { return false; } JdkDynamicAopProxy otherProxy; if (other instanceof JdkDynamicAopProxy) { otherProxy = (JdkDynamicAopProxy) other; } else if (Proxy.isProxyClass(other.getClass())) { InvocationHandler ih = Proxy.getInvocationHandler(other); if (!(ih instanceof JdkDynamicAopProxy)) { return false; } otherProxy = (JdkDynamicAopProxy) ih; } else { // Not a valid comparison... return false; } // If we get here, otherProxy is the other AopProxy. return AopProxyUtils.equalsInProxy(this.advised, otherProxy.advised); } /** * Proxy uses the hash code of the TargetSource. */ @Override public int hashCode() { return JdkDynamicAopProxy.class.hashCode() * 13 + this.advised.getTargetSource().hashCode(); } }

先看获取代理的方法

@Override public Object getProxy() { return getProxy(ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader()); } @Override public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: " + this.advised.getTargetSource()); } Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true); findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces); return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this); }

最终调用了 jdk 生成代理的方法,并且该类实现类 InvocationHandler 接口,那么继续看 invoke 方法

/** * Implementation of {@code InvocationHandler.invoke}. * <p>Callers will see exactly the exception thrown by the target, * unless a hook method throws an exception. */ @Override @Nullable public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { MethodInvocation invocation; Object oldProxy = null; boolean setProxyContext = false; TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource; Object target = null; try { if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself. return equals(args[0]); } else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself. return hashCode(); } else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) { // There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config. return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised); } else if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() && method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) { // Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config... return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args); } Object retVal; if (this.advised.exposeProxy) { // Make invocation available if necessary. oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy); setProxyContext = true; } // Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target, // in case it comes from a pool. target = targetSource.getTarget(); Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null); // Get the interception chain for this method. List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass); // Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct // reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation. if (chain.isEmpty()) { // We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly // Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does // nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying. Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args); retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse); } else { // We need to create a method invocation... invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain); // Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain. retVal = invocation.proceed(); } // Massage return value if necessary. Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType(); if (retVal != null && retVal == target && returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) && !RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) { // Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method // is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets // a reference to itself in another returned object. retVal = proxy; } else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) { throw new AopInvocationException( "Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method); } return retVal; } finally { if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) { // Must have come from TargetSource. targetSource.releaseTarget(target); } if (setProxyContext) { // Restore old proxy. AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy); } } }

忽略了几种特殊情况,然后判断是否报漏代理,即业务代码能不能通过

AopContext.currentProxy()
方法获得,之后真正的进行多个切面的执行

1.先获取拦截器链 2.遍历该拦截器链 3.通过 ReflectiveMethodInvocation 方法的 proceed()方法执行

获取拦截器链,应该是加载的时候每个方法对应的一个缓存

/** * Determine a list of {@link org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInterceptor} objects * for the given method, based on this configuration. * @param method the proxied method * @param targetClass the target class * @return a List of MethodInterceptors (may also include InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatchers) */ public List<Object> getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { MethodCacheKey cacheKey = new MethodCacheKey(method); List<Object> cached = this.methodCache.get(cacheKey); if (cached == null) { cached = this.advisorChainFactory.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice( this, method, targetClass); this.methodCache.put(cacheKey, cached); } return cached; }

ReflectiveMethodInvocation 的 procceed()执行逻辑

@Override @Nullable public Object proceed() throws Throwable { // We start with an index of -1 and increment early. if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) { return invokeJoinpoint(); } Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice = this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex); if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) { // Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have // been evaluated and found to match. InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm = (InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice; Class<?> targetClass = (this.targetClass != null ? this.targetClass : this.method.getDeclaringClass()); if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, targetClass, this.arguments)) { return dm.interceptor.invoke(this); } else { // Dynamic matching failed. // Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain. return proceed(); } } else { // It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have // been evaluated statically before this object was constructed. return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this); } }

可以看出该方法是一个递归,默认 currentInterceptorIndex 为 0,如果不是链最后一个则执行,之后通过递归实现链中下一个拦截器执行,如果是最后一个则执行实际被代理的方法,这样递归实现,能有效的解决环绕通知中前后的执行顺序的正确性

版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议,转载请附上原文出处链接和本声明。

本文链接:https://blog.csdn.net/qq_32224047/article/details/107146328
  • Spring

    Spring 是一个开源框架,是于 2003 年兴起的一个轻量级的 Java 开发框架,由 Rod Johnson 在其著作《Expert One-On-One J2EE Development and Design》中阐述的部分理念和原型衍生而来。它是为了解决企业应用开发的复杂性而创建的。框架的主要优势之一就是其分层架构,分层架构允许使用者选择使用哪一个组件,同时为 JavaEE 应用程序开发提供集成的框架。

    948 引用 • 1460 回帖 • 1 关注
  • AOP
    21 引用 • 13 回帖
  • AspectJ
    1 引用

相关帖子

欢迎来到这里!

我们正在构建一个小众社区,大家在这里相互信任,以平等 • 自由 • 奔放的价值观进行分享交流。最终,希望大家能够找到与自己志同道合的伙伴,共同成长。

注册 关于
请输入回帖内容 ...
zhaozhizheng
没有人会关心你付出过多少努力,撑得累不累,摔得痛不痛,他们只会看你最后站在什么位置,然后羡慕或者鄙夷 北京

推荐标签 标签

  • 工具

    子曰:“工欲善其事,必先利其器。”

    298 引用 • 763 回帖
  • 知乎

    知乎是网络问答社区,连接各行各业的用户。用户分享着彼此的知识、经验和见解,为中文互联网源源不断地提供多种多样的信息。

    10 引用 • 66 回帖 • 1 关注
  • Scala

    Scala 是一门多范式的编程语言,集成面向对象编程和函数式编程的各种特性。

    13 引用 • 11 回帖 • 158 关注
  • OpenCV
    15 引用 • 36 回帖 • 5 关注
  • 招聘

    哪里都缺人,哪里都不缺人。

    188 引用 • 1057 回帖
  • 正则表达式

    正则表达式(Regular Expression)使用单个字符串来描述、匹配一系列遵循某个句法规则的字符串。

    31 引用 • 94 回帖 • 2 关注
  • MySQL

    MySQL 是一个关系型数据库管理系统,由瑞典 MySQL AB 公司开发,目前属于 Oracle 公司。MySQL 是最流行的关系型数据库管理系统之一。

    693 引用 • 537 回帖
  • 链滴

    链滴是一个记录生活的地方。

    记录生活,连接点滴

    174 引用 • 3851 回帖 • 1 关注
  • SOHO

    为成为自由职业者在家办公而努力吧!

    7 引用 • 55 回帖 • 1 关注
  • FlowUs

    FlowUs.息流 个人及团队的新一代生产力工具。

    让复杂的信息管理更轻松、自由、充满创意。

    1 引用
  • Wide

    Wide 是一款基于 Web 的 Go 语言 IDE。通过浏览器就可以进行 Go 开发,并有代码自动完成、查看表达式、编译反馈、Lint、实时结果输出等功能。

    欢迎访问我们运维的实例: https://wide.b3log.org

    30 引用 • 218 回帖 • 639 关注
  • Pipe

    Pipe 是一款小而美的开源博客平台。Pipe 有着非常活跃的社区,可将文章作为帖子推送到社区,来自社区的回帖将作为博客评论进行联动(具体细节请浏览 B3log 构思 - 分布式社区网络)。

    这是一种全新的网络社区体验,让热爱记录和分享的你不再感到孤单!

    133 引用 • 1124 回帖 • 113 关注
  • 音乐

    你听到信仰的声音了么?

    62 引用 • 512 回帖
  • C

    C 语言是一门通用计算机编程语言,应用广泛。C 语言的设计目标是提供一种能以简易的方式编译、处理低级存储器、产生少量的机器码以及不需要任何运行环境支持便能运行的编程语言。

    86 引用 • 165 回帖 • 1 关注
  • NGINX

    NGINX 是一个高性能的 HTTP 和反向代理服务器,也是一个 IMAP/POP3/SMTP 代理服务器。 NGINX 是由 Igor Sysoev 为俄罗斯访问量第二的 Rambler.ru 站点开发的,第一个公开版本 0.1.0 发布于 2004 年 10 月 4 日。

    315 引用 • 547 回帖 • 2 关注
  • Ubuntu

    Ubuntu(友帮拓、优般图、乌班图)是一个以桌面应用为主的 Linux 操作系统,其名称来自非洲南部祖鲁语或豪萨语的“ubuntu”一词,意思是“人性”、“我的存在是因为大家的存在”,是非洲传统的一种价值观,类似华人社会的“仁爱”思想。Ubuntu 的目标在于为一般用户提供一个最新的、同时又相当稳定的主要由自由软件构建而成的操作系统。

    127 引用 • 169 回帖
  • Mac

    Mac 是苹果公司自 1984 年起以“Macintosh”开始开发的个人消费型计算机,如:iMac、Mac mini、Macbook Air、Macbook Pro、Macbook、Mac Pro 等计算机。

    168 引用 • 597 回帖 • 2 关注
  • 印象笔记
    3 引用 • 16 回帖 • 3 关注
  • OpenStack

    OpenStack 是一个云操作系统,通过数据中心可控制大型的计算、存储、网络等资源池。所有的管理通过前端界面管理员就可以完成,同样也可以通过 Web 接口让最终用户部署资源。

    10 引用 • 5 关注
  • HHKB

    HHKB 是富士通的 Happy Hacking 系列电容键盘。电容键盘即无接点静电电容式键盘(Capacitive Keyboard)。

    5 引用 • 74 回帖 • 503 关注
  • 周末

    星期六到星期天晚,实行五天工作制后,指每周的最后两天。再过几年可能就是三天了。

    14 引用 • 297 回帖 • 1 关注
  • Shell

    Shell 脚本与 Windows/Dos 下的批处理相似,也就是用各类命令预先放入到一个文件中,方便一次性执行的一个程序文件,主要是方便管理员进行设置或者管理用的。但是它比 Windows 下的批处理更强大,比用其他编程程序编辑的程序效率更高,因为它使用了 Linux/Unix 下的命令。

    124 引用 • 74 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 七牛云

    七牛云是国内领先的企业级公有云服务商,致力于打造以数据为核心的场景化 PaaS 服务。围绕富媒体场景,七牛先后推出了对象存储,融合 CDN 加速,数据通用处理,内容反垃圾服务,以及直播云服务等。

    28 引用 • 226 回帖 • 132 关注
  • CodeMirror
    2 引用 • 17 回帖 • 161 关注
  • Openfire

    Openfire 是开源的、基于可拓展通讯和表示协议 (XMPP)、采用 Java 编程语言开发的实时协作服务器。Openfire 的效率很高,单台服务器可支持上万并发用户。

    6 引用 • 7 回帖 • 105 关注
  • 爬虫

    网络爬虫(Spider、Crawler),是一种按照一定的规则,自动地抓取万维网信息的程序。

    106 引用 • 275 回帖
  • ZooKeeper

    ZooKeeper 是一个分布式的,开放源码的分布式应用程序协调服务,是 Google 的 Chubby 一个开源的实现,是 Hadoop 和 HBase 的重要组件。它是一个为分布式应用提供一致性服务的软件,提供的功能包括:配置维护、域名服务、分布式同步、组服务等。

    59 引用 • 29 回帖