My Biggest Regret As A Programmer

本贴最后更新于 3149 天前,其中的信息可能已经时移世改

A little over 20 years ago I was at a crossroads. My second company was petering out when our 5 years of building Deltagraph for the publisher ended (they wanted to move into the nascent internet space). At that point I had 13 years experience as a programmer but also 9 years or so experience running a company (at the same time).

I no longer wanted to do both. My first company 85-87 not only built a new kind of spreadsheet program but also published it ourselves. I led the company, did all the press interviews, managed the investors, did all the usual business stuff and also was one of the three programmers and the UI designer. After we shipped the product in early 87 I also wound up in the hospital. Trying to be both leader and programmer was simply too much.

So at that point in 1994 I could have gone either into technical management or continued as a programmer. I chose programmer because it was easier. Today I now realize how wrong I was despite all the great stuff I’ve been able to work on and ship over the past 20 years. Going towards the CTO/CIO/VP Engineering route, which was fairly new back then, would have been a much better plan.

I was in the Bay area for a year around 1995 and worked at Apple for the last half. Apple looked to be falling apart and I left to return to Texas as I didn’t want to see my favorite company die around me. Big mistake.

Not only did Apple begin a huge turnaround a year later when Steve came back, but the whole Dotcom explosion happened. Being both an experienced programmer and leader who understood what it took to deliver (we did 9 major releases of the apps during my time, all of which I built the master floppies for, with no need for hot fixes which were hard to do then anyway) I can only imagine how in demand I could have been. Once you get to the level of one of those titles you can keep moving forward and up.

My sister started as a programmer 30 years ago but jumped into management within the first year and has been a VP at a big company for the past 15 or so years. The huge parent of the travel company I worked for a couple years ago had a CEO who started 15 years earlier as a programmer. Of course these types of jobs can be hard and unpleasant but for that the renumeration is way greater. My sister has 10X the assets I have.

Over the years I’ve seen how little ability you have as a programmer, no matter how good you are, at making a difference or changing things that are broken. I simply didn’t realize how little room you have to advance as just a programmer (or even architect or the like); the power to change exists at a level not available to you as a mere delivery device. Add to that the financial benefits, the higher likelihood of substantial IPO participation, and all the other things you gain access to, and being a programmer means you have to be happy with the opportunity to build cool things.

Over the years the worst places I’ve worked or helped as a consultant for those 5 or so years I did that were almost always due to inept, incompetent or downright idiotic technology management. There isn’t enough room in this blog to list them all.

Take the VP of engineering for a bank who remarked that he didn’t need to understand technology as he managed people, yet still made technology decisions. The CIO at the same place never believed anything his employees told him but believed everything vendors told him. Of course we knew he was taking kickbacks as we kept buying things we had no use for and he kept writing articles for them relating how wonderful their products were for us. Yet we used almost none of it. Some time after I left he was fired and perp-walked out of the company yet immediately got another similar CIO position.

The worst job I ever had started out as what I thought would be awesome. A post-startup had a successful niche in their industry; both they and their arch-rivals (different niche) both wanted to launch into a broader public market and the market was heating up. I was hired as a second programmer. The other programmer and manager had been hired to build a new broader online store as the existing one was too inflexible and slow for a big market. The company had zero technical leadership otherwise, the CEO and the other two founders had no technical experience or knowledge. The programmer constantly talked about how wonderful his backend code was and the manager supported him. I built a front end piece, put up demos, checked in my source every day. When I thought it a good time to integrate I discovered the other programmer after 10 months had checked in—nothing. When I pointed this out the manager said “he never checks in anything until it’s perfect”. Yet no one called this out as stupid other than me. I spent the next two months trying desperately to get the 3 founders to bring in people who could actually deliver (I knew several people) but they were afraid to make any changes and admit they had screwed up in hiring these two guys. Eventually I gave up and left.

A year later after still getting nothing from this guy they fired both of them. They tried to hire some consulting firm but got nothing from them either. By this time it was too late. The rivals? They became a billion dollar public company and I see their commercials on TV sometimes. I always want to throw a shoe at the TV when I see them. We had everything but a damn store and in reality actual technology leadership. If I had been such a person instead of a programmer I would have had the track record and clout to make it happen. But all I was was a programmer.

I could go on and on but the key is that you can’t make changes in how people do things in a technical sense unless you have the ability, the authority and the opportunity. Once you make that call and assuming you find the right places to grow, the sky is really the limit.

When I was on TV (Computer Chronicles) in early 1987 showing our product Trapeze the other presenter was Mike Slade who was product manager of Excel. At the time young me thought him some random marketing weenie (young people can be pretty stupid). Yet he started all these companies later including ESPN, worked for Apple in various leadership roles, was a good friend of Steve Jobs and started his own VC firm.

And today I am still just a programmer. Who’s the weenie now? I doubt I will ever be able to really retire. Thankfully I am still good at delivery (I was recruited into my present job by a former manager who needed what he knew I can do) but still all I will be until I croak is what I am now.

Being a programmer for nearly 35 years and still being able to get things done and ship is still fun and I’ve been able to work on amazing things over the years. But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

I came to a fork in the road and took the one less traveled. Perhaps now I realize why.

source: http://thecodist.com/article/my-biggest-regret-as-a-programmer

  • 程序员

    程序员是从事程序开发、程序维护的专业人员。

    568 引用 • 3532 回帖
  • 遗憾
    2 引用 • 8 回帖

相关帖子

欢迎来到这里!

我们正在构建一个小众社区,大家在这里相互信任,以平等 • 自由 • 奔放的价值观进行分享交流。最终,希望大家能够找到与自己志同道合的伙伴,共同成长。

注册 关于
请输入回帖内容 ...
  • ss

    @Vanessa 一个愤世嫉俗的老程序员瞎掰掰。关于做程序员还是做管理纠结来纠结去。做了很久程序员就羡慕管理的,做了管理的觉得管理的人很傻就觉得还是程序员好。纠结来纠结去截止文章发稿,作者觉得还是程序员好一点,还是啥好?不知道现在改了没有。
    看看这个纠结劲:

    But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

    So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

    啊,真替他纠结啊,到老还惦记着 return of Steve to Apple 那件事。直接最适合做一个湿人了。

  • 其他回帖
  • @Vanessa http://blog.jobbole.com/99428/ 这里有翻译,不允许转载,直接贴链接了。。。

  • 转管理后,静静的写下代码就是一种享受

  • ss

    原作者很的样子。

    When I started programming for money in 1981, there weren't a whole lot of choices to argue about. I started with Fortran but was also exposed to various assembly languages, Jovial (the precursor to Ada), Pascal and someone once handed me some sample code written in PL/1 which gave me a headache. I had used Basic and a little APL but that was pretty much it. I knew of Cobol, at least enough to run away. Most people just knew one and maybe a little assembly.

    ...

    When I started coding in C in 1985 I didn't change languages (other than a dab of 68000 assembly) for 10 years. Eventually C++ become an on-again-off-again lover. Objective-C came and went and came again bigtime. Java dominated for a while while Javascript waxed and wained and waxed so many times like some kind of Karate Kid metaphor. In the past decade I've dabbled in Ruby briefly, dissed PHP in this blog and then learned to appreciate it (this blog is still written in it) and then had people scream at me to run away.

    Of course I've longed to go deep functional with Haskell or Erlang or Scala or even Clojure but the brain isn't functional enough to add another language at this time. Someone pointed out Rust as a great language but I really wanted to learn Metal. Somehow I spent a swift time learning Swift but it kept mutating while I coded. Any more language puns and I will be Brainfucked.

    ...

    用过这么多编程语言语言:

    Fortran->PL/1->Basic/ APL->C->C++ ->java->javasrcipt->php-> Haskell or Erlang or Scala or even Clojure -> Metal ->Swift

    结论:

    You could give up programming languages entirely except for APL. I guarantee once you master APL your brain will explode and the problem will be solved without exception.

  • 查看全部回帖

推荐标签 标签

  • 又拍云

    又拍云是国内领先的 CDN 服务提供商,国家工信部认证通过的“可信云”,乌云众测平台认证的“安全云”,为移动时代的创业者提供新一代的 CDN 加速服务。

    21 引用 • 37 回帖 • 545 关注
  • Pipe

    Pipe 是一款小而美的开源博客平台。Pipe 有着非常活跃的社区,可将文章作为帖子推送到社区,来自社区的回帖将作为博客评论进行联动(具体细节请浏览 B3log 构思 - 分布式社区网络)。

    这是一种全新的网络社区体验,让热爱记录和分享的你不再感到孤单!

    132 引用 • 1114 回帖 • 124 关注
  • Electron

    Electron 基于 Chromium 和 Node.js,让你可以使用 HTML、CSS 和 JavaScript 构建应用。它是一个由 GitHub 及众多贡献者组成的活跃社区共同维护的开源项目,兼容 Mac、Windows 和 Linux,它构建的应用可在这三个操作系统上面运行。

    15 引用 • 136 回帖
  • WordPress

    WordPress 是一个使用 PHP 语言开发的博客平台,用户可以在支持 PHP 和 MySQL 数据库的服务器上架设自己的博客。也可以把 WordPress 当作一个内容管理系统(CMS)来使用。WordPress 是一个免费的开源项目,在 GNU 通用公共许可证(GPLv2)下授权发布。

    66 引用 • 114 回帖 • 228 关注
  • Node.js

    Node.js 是一个基于 Chrome JavaScript 运行时建立的平台, 用于方便地搭建响应速度快、易于扩展的网络应用。Node.js 使用事件驱动, 非阻塞 I/O 模型而得以轻量和高效。

    139 引用 • 269 回帖 • 43 关注
  • Bootstrap

    Bootstrap 是 Twitter 推出的一个用于前端开发的开源工具包。它由 Twitter 的设计师 Mark Otto 和 Jacob Thornton 合作开发,是一个 CSS / HTML 框架。

    18 引用 • 33 回帖 • 660 关注
  • Vim

    Vim 是类 UNIX 系统文本编辑器 Vi 的加强版本,加入了更多特性来帮助编辑源代码。Vim 的部分增强功能包括文件比较(vimdiff)、语法高亮、全面的帮助系统、本地脚本(Vimscript)和便于选择的可视化模式。

    29 引用 • 66 回帖
  • Gitea

    Gitea 是一个开源社区驱动的轻量级代码托管解决方案,后端采用 Go 编写,采用 MIT 许可证。

    4 引用 • 16 回帖 • 6 关注
  • Mobi.css

    Mobi.css is a lightweight, flexible CSS framework that focus on mobile.

    1 引用 • 6 回帖 • 733 关注
  • ReactiveX

    ReactiveX 是一个专注于异步编程与控制可观察数据(或者事件)流的 API。它组合了观察者模式,迭代器模式和函数式编程的优秀思想。

    1 引用 • 2 回帖 • 155 关注
  • 安全

    安全永远都不是一个小问题。

    199 引用 • 816 回帖 • 2 关注
  • 机器学习

    机器学习(Machine Learning)是一门多领域交叉学科,涉及概率论、统计学、逼近论、凸分析、算法复杂度理论等多门学科。专门研究计算机怎样模拟或实现人类的学习行为,以获取新的知识或技能,重新组织已有的知识结构使之不断改善自身的性能。

    83 引用 • 37 回帖
  • Kafka

    Kafka 是一种高吞吐量的分布式发布订阅消息系统,它可以处理消费者规模的网站中的所有动作流数据。 这种动作(网页浏览,搜索和其他用户的行动)是现代系统中许多功能的基础。 这些数据通常是由于吞吐量的要求而通过处理日志和日志聚合来解决。

    36 引用 • 35 回帖
  • API

    应用程序编程接口(Application Programming Interface)是一些预先定义的函数,目的是提供应用程序与开发人员基于某软件或硬件得以访问一组例程的能力,而又无需访问源码,或理解内部工作机制的细节。

    77 引用 • 430 回帖
  • 生活

    生活是指人类生存过程中的各项活动的总和,范畴较广,一般指为幸福的意义而存在。生活实际上是对人生的一种诠释。生活包括人类在社会中与自己息息相关的日常活动和心理影射。

    230 引用 • 1454 回帖
  • SMTP

    SMTP(Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)即简单邮件传输协议,它是一组用于由源地址到目的地址传送邮件的规则,由它来控制信件的中转方式。SMTP 协议属于 TCP/IP 协议簇,它帮助每台计算机在发送或中转信件时找到下一个目的地。

    4 引用 • 18 回帖 • 614 关注
  • Kotlin

    Kotlin 是一种在 Java 虚拟机上运行的静态类型编程语言,由 JetBrains 设计开发并开源。Kotlin 可以编译成 Java 字节码,也可以编译成 JavaScript,方便在没有 JVM 的设备上运行。在 Google I/O 2017 中,Google 宣布 Kotlin 成为 Android 官方开发语言。

    19 引用 • 33 回帖 • 63 关注
  • 域名

    域名(Domain Name),简称域名、网域,是由一串用点分隔的名字组成的 Internet 上某一台计算机或计算机组的名称,用于在数据传输时标识计算机的电子方位(有时也指地理位置)。

    43 引用 • 208 回帖
  • 京东

    京东是中国最大的自营式电商企业,2015 年第一季度在中国自营式 B2C 电商市场的占有率为 56.3%。2014 年 5 月,京东在美国纳斯达克证券交易所正式挂牌上市(股票代码:JD),是中国第一个成功赴美上市的大型综合型电商平台,与腾讯、百度等中国互联网巨头共同跻身全球前十大互联网公司排行榜。

    14 引用 • 102 回帖 • 374 关注
  • 反馈

    Communication channel for makers and users.

    123 引用 • 911 回帖 • 245 关注
  • Hibernate

    Hibernate 是一个开放源代码的对象关系映射框架,它对 JDBC 进行了非常轻量级的对象封装,使得 Java 程序员可以随心所欲的使用对象编程思维来操纵数据库。

    39 引用 • 103 回帖 • 710 关注
  • 思源笔记

    思源笔记是一款隐私优先的个人知识管理系统,支持完全离线使用,同时也支持端到端加密同步。

    融合块、大纲和双向链接,重构你的思维。

    22352 引用 • 89437 回帖
  • JetBrains

    JetBrains 是一家捷克的软件开发公司,该公司位于捷克的布拉格,并在俄国的圣彼得堡及美国麻州波士顿都设有办公室,该公司最为人所熟知的产品是 Java 编程语言开发撰写时所用的集成开发环境:IntelliJ IDEA

    18 引用 • 54 回帖
  • Elasticsearch

    Elasticsearch 是一个基于 Lucene 的搜索服务器。它提供了一个分布式多用户能力的全文搜索引擎,基于 RESTful 接口。Elasticsearch 是用 Java 开发的,并作为 Apache 许可条款下的开放源码发布,是当前流行的企业级搜索引擎。设计用于云计算中,能够达到实时搜索,稳定,可靠,快速,安装使用方便。

    117 引用 • 99 回帖 • 212 关注
  • Log4j

    Log4j 是 Apache 开源的一款使用广泛的 Java 日志组件。

    20 引用 • 18 回帖 • 30 关注
  • GitBook

    GitBook 使您的团队可以轻松编写和维护高质量的文档。 分享知识,提高团队的工作效率,让用户满意。

    3 引用 • 8 回帖 • 4 关注
  • 链滴

    链滴是一个记录生活的地方。

    记录生活,连接点滴

    153 引用 • 3783 回帖 • 1 关注