My Biggest Regret As A Programmer

本贴最后更新于 3149 天前,其中的信息可能已经时移世改

A little over 20 years ago I was at a crossroads. My second company was petering out when our 5 years of building Deltagraph for the publisher ended (they wanted to move into the nascent internet space). At that point I had 13 years experience as a programmer but also 9 years or so experience running a company (at the same time).

I no longer wanted to do both. My first company 85-87 not only built a new kind of spreadsheet program but also published it ourselves. I led the company, did all the press interviews, managed the investors, did all the usual business stuff and also was one of the three programmers and the UI designer. After we shipped the product in early 87 I also wound up in the hospital. Trying to be both leader and programmer was simply too much.

So at that point in 1994 I could have gone either into technical management or continued as a programmer. I chose programmer because it was easier. Today I now realize how wrong I was despite all the great stuff I’ve been able to work on and ship over the past 20 years. Going towards the CTO/CIO/VP Engineering route, which was fairly new back then, would have been a much better plan.

I was in the Bay area for a year around 1995 and worked at Apple for the last half. Apple looked to be falling apart and I left to return to Texas as I didn’t want to see my favorite company die around me. Big mistake.

Not only did Apple begin a huge turnaround a year later when Steve came back, but the whole Dotcom explosion happened. Being both an experienced programmer and leader who understood what it took to deliver (we did 9 major releases of the apps during my time, all of which I built the master floppies for, with no need for hot fixes which were hard to do then anyway) I can only imagine how in demand I could have been. Once you get to the level of one of those titles you can keep moving forward and up.

My sister started as a programmer 30 years ago but jumped into management within the first year and has been a VP at a big company for the past 15 or so years. The huge parent of the travel company I worked for a couple years ago had a CEO who started 15 years earlier as a programmer. Of course these types of jobs can be hard and unpleasant but for that the renumeration is way greater. My sister has 10X the assets I have.

Over the years I’ve seen how little ability you have as a programmer, no matter how good you are, at making a difference or changing things that are broken. I simply didn’t realize how little room you have to advance as just a programmer (or even architect or the like); the power to change exists at a level not available to you as a mere delivery device. Add to that the financial benefits, the higher likelihood of substantial IPO participation, and all the other things you gain access to, and being a programmer means you have to be happy with the opportunity to build cool things.

Over the years the worst places I’ve worked or helped as a consultant for those 5 or so years I did that were almost always due to inept, incompetent or downright idiotic technology management. There isn’t enough room in this blog to list them all.

Take the VP of engineering for a bank who remarked that he didn’t need to understand technology as he managed people, yet still made technology decisions. The CIO at the same place never believed anything his employees told him but believed everything vendors told him. Of course we knew he was taking kickbacks as we kept buying things we had no use for and he kept writing articles for them relating how wonderful their products were for us. Yet we used almost none of it. Some time after I left he was fired and perp-walked out of the company yet immediately got another similar CIO position.

The worst job I ever had started out as what I thought would be awesome. A post-startup had a successful niche in their industry; both they and their arch-rivals (different niche) both wanted to launch into a broader public market and the market was heating up. I was hired as a second programmer. The other programmer and manager had been hired to build a new broader online store as the existing one was too inflexible and slow for a big market. The company had zero technical leadership otherwise, the CEO and the other two founders had no technical experience or knowledge. The programmer constantly talked about how wonderful his backend code was and the manager supported him. I built a front end piece, put up demos, checked in my source every day. When I thought it a good time to integrate I discovered the other programmer after 10 months had checked in—nothing. When I pointed this out the manager said “he never checks in anything until it’s perfect”. Yet no one called this out as stupid other than me. I spent the next two months trying desperately to get the 3 founders to bring in people who could actually deliver (I knew several people) but they were afraid to make any changes and admit they had screwed up in hiring these two guys. Eventually I gave up and left.

A year later after still getting nothing from this guy they fired both of them. They tried to hire some consulting firm but got nothing from them either. By this time it was too late. The rivals? They became a billion dollar public company and I see their commercials on TV sometimes. I always want to throw a shoe at the TV when I see them. We had everything but a damn store and in reality actual technology leadership. If I had been such a person instead of a programmer I would have had the track record and clout to make it happen. But all I was was a programmer.

I could go on and on but the key is that you can’t make changes in how people do things in a technical sense unless you have the ability, the authority and the opportunity. Once you make that call and assuming you find the right places to grow, the sky is really the limit.

When I was on TV (Computer Chronicles) in early 1987 showing our product Trapeze the other presenter was Mike Slade who was product manager of Excel. At the time young me thought him some random marketing weenie (young people can be pretty stupid). Yet he started all these companies later including ESPN, worked for Apple in various leadership roles, was a good friend of Steve Jobs and started his own VC firm.

And today I am still just a programmer. Who’s the weenie now? I doubt I will ever be able to really retire. Thankfully I am still good at delivery (I was recruited into my present job by a former manager who needed what he knew I can do) but still all I will be until I croak is what I am now.

Being a programmer for nearly 35 years and still being able to get things done and ship is still fun and I’ve been able to work on amazing things over the years. But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

I came to a fork in the road and took the one less traveled. Perhaps now I realize why.

source: http://thecodist.com/article/my-biggest-regret-as-a-programmer

  • 程序员

    程序员是从事程序开发、程序维护的专业人员。

    568 引用 • 3532 回帖
  • 遗憾
    2 引用 • 8 回帖

相关帖子

欢迎来到这里!

我们正在构建一个小众社区,大家在这里相互信任,以平等 • 自由 • 奔放的价值观进行分享交流。最终,希望大家能够找到与自己志同道合的伙伴,共同成长。

注册 关于
请输入回帖内容 ...
  • ss

    原作者很的样子。

    When I started programming for money in 1981, there weren't a whole lot of choices to argue about. I started with Fortran but was also exposed to various assembly languages, Jovial (the precursor to Ada), Pascal and someone once handed me some sample code written in PL/1 which gave me a headache. I had used Basic and a little APL but that was pretty much it. I knew of Cobol, at least enough to run away. Most people just knew one and maybe a little assembly.

    ...

    When I started coding in C in 1985 I didn't change languages (other than a dab of 68000 assembly) for 10 years. Eventually C++ become an on-again-off-again lover. Objective-C came and went and came again bigtime. Java dominated for a while while Javascript waxed and wained and waxed so many times like some kind of Karate Kid metaphor. In the past decade I've dabbled in Ruby briefly, dissed PHP in this blog and then learned to appreciate it (this blog is still written in it) and then had people scream at me to run away.

    Of course I've longed to go deep functional with Haskell or Erlang or Scala or even Clojure but the brain isn't functional enough to add another language at this time. Someone pointed out Rust as a great language but I really wanted to learn Metal. Somehow I spent a swift time learning Swift but it kept mutating while I coded. Any more language puns and I will be Brainfucked.

    ...

    用过这么多编程语言语言:

    Fortran->PL/1->Basic/ APL->C->C++ ->java->javasrcipt->php-> Haskell or Erlang or Scala or even Clojure -> Metal ->Swift

    结论:

    You could give up programming languages entirely except for APL. I guarantee once you master APL your brain will explode and the problem will be solved without exception.

  • 其他回帖
  • 可以翻译下么?

  • ss

    @Vanessa 一个愤世嫉俗的老程序员瞎掰掰。关于做程序员还是做管理纠结来纠结去。做了很久程序员就羡慕管理的,做了管理的觉得管理的人很傻就觉得还是程序员好。纠结来纠结去截止文章发稿,作者觉得还是程序员好一点,还是啥好?不知道现在改了没有。
    看看这个纠结劲:

    But I can still feel the regret of not seeking the challenge of just leadership. In some ways programming was the easy choice. Given how close I got to the whole Dotcom timeframe, or even the return of Steve to Apple, and still had recent leadership experience, I could have been almost anything.

    So yes I regret not taking that choice and seeing where it would have led me, yet I would have missed all the fun of writing code and the soul-draining jobs that often come with it where you can’t really fix anything.

    啊,真替他纠结啊,到老还惦记着 return of Steve to Apple 那件事。直接最适合做一个湿人了。

  • 转管理后,静静的写下代码就是一种享受

  • 查看全部回帖

推荐标签 标签

  • 机器学习

    机器学习(Machine Learning)是一门多领域交叉学科,涉及概率论、统计学、逼近论、凸分析、算法复杂度理论等多门学科。专门研究计算机怎样模拟或实现人类的学习行为,以获取新的知识或技能,重新组织已有的知识结构使之不断改善自身的性能。

    83 引用 • 37 回帖
  • 运维

    互联网运维工作,以服务为中心,以稳定、安全、高效为三个基本点,确保公司的互联网业务能够 7×24 小时为用户提供高质量的服务。

    149 引用 • 257 回帖
  • 持续集成

    持续集成(Continuous Integration)是一种软件开发实践,即团队开发成员经常集成他们的工作,通过每个成员每天至少集成一次,也就意味着每天可能会发生多次集成。每次集成都通过自动化的构建(包括编译,发布,自动化测试)来验证,从而尽早地发现集成错误。

    15 引用 • 7 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 开源中国

    开源中国是目前中国最大的开源技术社区。传播开源的理念,推广开源项目,为 IT 开发者提供了一个发现、使用、并交流开源技术的平台。目前开源中国社区已收录超过两万款开源软件。

    7 引用 • 86 回帖
  • 工具

    子曰:“工欲善其事,必先利其器。”

    286 引用 • 729 回帖
  • Java

    Java 是一种可以撰写跨平台应用软件的面向对象的程序设计语言,是由 Sun Microsystems 公司于 1995 年 5 月推出的。Java 技术具有卓越的通用性、高效性、平台移植性和安全性。

    3187 引用 • 8213 回帖
  • ActiveMQ

    ActiveMQ 是 Apache 旗下的一款开源消息总线系统,它完整实现了 JMS 规范,是一个企业级的消息中间件。

    19 引用 • 13 回帖 • 672 关注
  • 博客

    记录并分享人生的经历。

    273 引用 • 2388 回帖
  • Logseq

    Logseq 是一个隐私优先、开源的知识库工具。

    Logseq is a joyful, open-source outliner that works on top of local plain-text Markdown and Org-mode files. Use it to write, organize and share your thoughts, keep your to-do list, and build your own digital garden.

    6 引用 • 63 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 微软

    微软是一家美国跨国科技公司,也是世界 PC 软件开发的先导,由比尔·盖茨与保罗·艾伦创办于 1975 年,公司总部设立在华盛顿州的雷德蒙德(Redmond,邻近西雅图)。以研发、制造、授权和提供广泛的电脑软件服务业务为主。

    8 引用 • 44 回帖
  • MongoDB

    MongoDB(来自于英文单词“Humongous”,中文含义为“庞大”)是一个基于分布式文件存储的数据库,由 C++ 语言编写。旨在为应用提供可扩展的高性能数据存储解决方案。MongoDB 是一个介于关系数据库和非关系数据库之间的产品,是非关系数据库当中功能最丰富,最像关系数据库的。它支持的数据结构非常松散,是类似 JSON 的 BSON 格式,因此可以存储比较复杂的数据类型。

    90 引用 • 59 回帖 • 1 关注
  • 周末

    星期六到星期天晚,实行五天工作制后,指每周的最后两天。再过几年可能就是三天了。

    14 引用 • 297 回帖 • 1 关注
  • Thymeleaf

    Thymeleaf 是一款用于渲染 XML/XHTML/HTML5 内容的模板引擎。类似 Velocity、 FreeMarker 等,它也可以轻易的与 Spring 等 Web 框架进行集成作为 Web 应用的模板引擎。与其它模板引擎相比,Thymeleaf 最大的特点是能够直接在浏览器中打开并正确显示模板页面,而不需要启动整个 Web 应用。

    11 引用 • 19 回帖 • 354 关注
  • Maven

    Maven 是基于项目对象模型(POM)、通过一小段描述信息来管理项目的构建、报告和文档的软件项目管理工具。

    186 引用 • 318 回帖 • 304 关注
  • SMTP

    SMTP(Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)即简单邮件传输协议,它是一组用于由源地址到目的地址传送邮件的规则,由它来控制信件的中转方式。SMTP 协议属于 TCP/IP 协议簇,它帮助每台计算机在发送或中转信件时找到下一个目的地。

    4 引用 • 18 回帖 • 614 关注
  • 一些有用的避坑指南。

    69 引用 • 93 回帖
  • B3log

    B3log 是一个开源组织,名字来源于“Bulletin Board Blog”缩写,目标是将独立博客与论坛结合,形成一种新的网络社区体验,详细请看 B3log 构思。目前 B3log 已经开源了多款产品:SymSoloVditor思源笔记

    1063 引用 • 3453 回帖 • 203 关注
  • 心情

    心是产生任何想法的源泉,心本体会陷入到对自己本体不能理解的状态中,因为心能产生任何想法,不能分出对错,不能分出自己。

    59 引用 • 369 回帖
  • Python

    Python 是一种面向对象、直译式电脑编程语言,具有近二十年的发展历史,成熟且稳定。它包含了一组完善而且容易理解的标准库,能够轻松完成很多常见的任务。它的语法简捷和清晰,尽量使用无异义的英语单词,与其它大多数程序设计语言使用大括号不一样,它使用缩进来定义语句块。

    543 引用 • 672 回帖
  • InfluxDB

    InfluxDB 是一个开源的没有外部依赖的时间序列数据库。适用于记录度量,事件及实时分析。

    2 引用 • 72 关注
  • 以太坊

    以太坊(Ethereum)并不是一个机构,而是一款能够在区块链上实现智能合约、开源的底层系统。以太坊是一个平台和一种编程语言 Solidity,使开发人员能够建立和发布下一代去中心化应用。 以太坊可以用来编程、分散、担保和交易任何事物:投票、域名、金融交易所、众筹、公司管理、合同和知识产权等等。

    34 引用 • 367 回帖
  • PostgreSQL

    PostgreSQL 是一款功能强大的企业级数据库系统,在 BSD 开源许可证下发布。

    22 引用 • 22 回帖
  • WebClipper

    Web Clipper 是一款浏览器剪藏扩展,它可以帮助你把网页内容剪藏到本地。

    3 引用 • 9 回帖
  • 知乎

    知乎是网络问答社区,连接各行各业的用户。用户分享着彼此的知识、经验和见解,为中文互联网源源不断地提供多种多样的信息。

    10 引用 • 66 回帖
  • SQLServer

    SQL Server 是由 [微软] 开发和推广的关系数据库管理系统(DBMS),它最初是由 微软、Sybase 和 Ashton-Tate 三家公司共同开发的,并于 1988 年推出了第一个 OS/2 版本。

    21 引用 • 31 回帖
  • Sandbox

    如果帖子标签含有 Sandbox ,则该帖子会被视为“测试帖”,主要用于测试社区功能,排查 bug 等,该标签下内容不定期进行清理。

    407 引用 • 1246 回帖 • 582 关注
  • 域名

    域名(Domain Name),简称域名、网域,是由一串用点分隔的名字组成的 Internet 上某一台计算机或计算机组的名称,用于在数据传输时标识计算机的电子方位(有时也指地理位置)。

    43 引用 • 208 回帖